Readiness Assessment

Know exactly how migratable your network is - before you commit.

We read your geometric network geodatabase and measure it: schema alignment, connectivity integrity, data quality, and how cleanly it crosswalks to the real Esri Utility Network. You get a readiness score, a findings list, and a fixed not-to-exceed migration price.

The output

A report you can take to your board.

Here's a real, anonymized sample from a small municipal electric utility. Drop your details in and we'll send you the full report to read end to end.

🔒 app.nutility.io/assess/sample
UN Readiness Assessment · Sample utility
Sample
Overall readiness
60/100
Features assessed
74,723
Auto-mappable
97%
Readiness by dimension
Schema & structure alignment 63
Asset group / type taxonomy 53
Attribute & domain completeness 64
Connectivity & topology integrity 59
Subnetwork & tier definability 45
Associations & topology enablement 68
Data quality & integrity 78
Documentation & metadata 58
1 critical · 3 high · 3 medium · 1 low Migratable ✓

Download the full sample report

A real, end-to-end readiness assessment. We'll email you a copy too.

We'll only use your details to send the report and, if you'd like, scope your network. No spam.

A worked example

From legacy bank to Utility Network — line by line.

One section, lifted straight from the report: exactly how a transformer bank and its units land in the ArcGIS Utility Network — the class mapping, the associations, the rules to author, and the checks the assessment can actually prove.

05 · Transformer banks & units

Worked example — Transformer banks & units

Transformer banks show how a multi-part legacy asset lands in the Utility Network. The bank becomes an ElectricDevice (Medium Voltage Transformer); each unit becomes an ElectricJunctionObject. A connectivity association relates each unit back to its bank, carried over from your existing TransformerBankHasUnit relationship. These class names are set by the Esri model — they're fixed, not ours to rename.

2,586
Transformer banks
2,799
Transformer units
1.08
Units / bank (avg)
392
Unlinked (Gap)
Source elementUtility Network targetHow it maps
eTransformerBank (point)ElectricDevice · Medium Voltage TransformerRetag to the Esri class
eTransformerUnit (object)ElectricJunctionObjectRetag to the Esri class
TransformerBankHasUnitConnectivity association (bank ↔ unit)From the existing relationship
eTransformerUnlinked (392)Link to a bank, then mapGap to resolve first

Rules to author

  • Connectivity association rule — relate each unit to its bank with a connectivity association, generating ~2,799 of them from the existing TransformerBankHasUnit relationship (a head start most estates lack).
  • Terminal configuration — assign a multi-terminal config to each transformer so flow routes HV→LV; without it, traces pass through transformers incorrectly.
  • Connectivity rule — define which conductor asset types may connect to each transformer terminal (primary→HV, secondary→LV).
  • Linking rule — resolve the 392 eTransformerUnlinked features: match to nearest bank by proximity/feeder; queue ambiguous cases for SME review.

Checks the assessment can prove

  • Count reconciliation — 2,586 banks, 2,799 units (~1.08 per bank); flag empty banks (0 units) and orphan units (no bank).
  • Linkable units — measure how many of the 392 unlinked transformers can be matched to a bank, and how many need SME review.
  • Relationship integrity — every unit resolves to exactly one bank; flag any unit tied to multiple banks or none.
What's inside

Measured, not guessed.

The whole report is generated from your actual data. Every number traces back to a measurement pass over your geodatabase — so it's diffable, defensible, and yours.

Measured readiness score

A 0–100 UN-readiness score across eight dimensions, derived from your real schema, connectivity, and data-quality signals — not a survey.

Crosswalk to real Esri packages

Every feature class mapped to the genuine ArcGIS Utility Network asset packages, with a ✓ on each target confirmed to exist in the package.

Findings ranked by severity

Critical, high, medium, and low findings logged against your estate, each with what it means for migration and how it gets resolved.

A fixed-price path to go-live

A clear migration path with a worked example and a not-to-exceed price — so the number you take to your board is firm, not a guess. The $10K assessment fee is credited in full if you proceed.

How it works

Three steps to a firm number.

01

Send us your geodatabase

A copy of your geometric network File Geodatabase — the system of record you migrate from.

02

We read and score it

Schema → connectivity → census → crosswalk → scoring passes run over a copy of your geodatabase — no system access, no disruption.

03

You get the report

A standalone, data-driven readiness report and a fixed not-to-exceed price for the migration itself.

Find out where your network really stands.

Read the sample, then send us your geodatabase. You'll get a measured readiness score and a fixed not-to-exceed price. The assessment is a flat $10,000 — credited in full toward your migration if you move forward.

Get the latest updates

Subscribe to our newsletter

Utility Network migration insights and field notes from the geometric-network exodus — a few times a quarter, no fluff.

An AI agent workforce for utility GIS — off the retired geometric network and onto the Esri ArcGIS Utility Network, backed by senior engineers.

hello@nutility.io
2650 W Belleview Ave, Suite D-100
Littleton, CO 80123
© 2026 Nutility, LLC. All rights reserved.